▲ 172 ▼ Theory vs Practice (lemmygrad.ml) submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) Then comes the third entrepreneur permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Streptember@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) And the two established businesses just artificially lower their prices to keep out the competition, forcing the third to stop trying to compete. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pinklink@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago That’s the problem with having money to lose to keep from losing money in the long term: firmly established companies with money to spare can always keep startups from succeeding, and all they have to do is wait out the limited money of smaller competitors to get back to ripping off the consumer permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Diluting their milk with sewage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) or paying their workers even less "its a gig! you make milk for a few hours to get some more money! grindset!!!!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago fun fact, Marx actually summed up the whole gig economy in Das Kapital permalink fedilink source parent [–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago May i present you the idea of "cartel"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Streptember@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) And the two established businesses just artificially lower their prices to keep out the competition, forcing the third to stop trying to compete. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pinklink@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago That’s the problem with having money to lose to keep from losing money in the long term: firmly established companies with money to spare can always keep startups from succeeding, and all they have to do is wait out the limited money of smaller competitors to get back to ripping off the consumer permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pinklink@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago That’s the problem with having money to lose to keep from losing money in the long term: firmly established companies with money to spare can always keep startups from succeeding, and all they have to do is wait out the limited money of smaller competitors to get back to ripping off the consumer permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Diluting their milk with sewage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) or paying their workers even less "its a gig! you make milk for a few hours to get some more money! grindset!!!!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago fun fact, Marx actually summed up the whole gig economy in Das Kapital permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) or paying their workers even less "its a gig! you make milk for a few hours to get some more money! grindset!!!!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago fun fact, Marx actually summed up the whole gig economy in Das Kapital permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago fun fact, Marx actually summed up the whole gig economy in Das Kapital permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago May i present you the idea of "cartel"? permalink fedilink source parent
