▲ 391 ▼ Zed on Linux is out! (zed.dev) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ksp@jlai.lu to c/linux@lemmy.ml 212 comments fedilink hide all child comments Zed is a modern open-source code editor, built from the ground up in Rust with a GPU-accelerated renderer.
[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Flatpak is worse for debugging, development, and reproducibility. Its good for user friendly sandboxing, portability, and convenience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wfh@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is it really worse tho? A single build, against a single runtime, free from distro specificities, packaged by the devs themselves instead of offloading the work on distro maintainers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* It is. Security problem in core library? Good luck waiting for 27 randos releasing an update. Whereas the distro updates it even before the issue becomes public. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago I'll have to come up with some examples and write something more detailed I think to explore this. Until NixOS I was very in favor of language specific package managers and things like flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Flatpaks are reproducible https://ranfdev.com/blog/flatpak-builds-are-not-reproducible/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago You see the conclusion of that article is that flatpaks are not repeoducible after presenting solutions to make it reproducible right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wfh@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (2 children) Is it really worse tho? A single build, against a single runtime, free from distro specificities, packaged by the devs themselves instead of offloading the work on distro maintainers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* It is. Security problem in core library? Good luck waiting for 27 randos releasing an update. Whereas the distro updates it even before the issue becomes public. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago I'll have to come up with some examples and write something more detailed I think to explore this. Until NixOS I was very in favor of language specific package managers and things like flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* It is. Security problem in core library? Good luck waiting for 27 randos releasing an update. Whereas the distro updates it even before the issue becomes public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago I'll have to come up with some examples and write something more detailed I think to explore this. Until NixOS I was very in favor of language specific package managers and things like flatpak. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Flatpaks are reproducible https://ranfdev.com/blog/flatpak-builds-are-not-reproducible/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago You see the conclusion of that article is that flatpaks are not repeoducible after presenting solutions to make it reproducible right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago You see the conclusion of that article is that flatpaks are not repeoducible after presenting solutions to make it reproducible right? permalink fedilink source parent