▲ 391 ▼ Zed on Linux is out! (zed.dev) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ksp@jlai.lu to c/linux@lemmy.ml 212 comments fedilink hide all child comments Zed is a modern open-source code editor, built from the ground up in Rust with a GPU-accelerated renderer.
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://zed.dev/docs/linux#installing-via-a-package-manager permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cerement@slrpnk.net 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) ooh, available for “x86_65” on Alpine (and they’ve fixed that now) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Have you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Finally. 65 bit processor. permalink fedilink source parent [–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 years ago (1 child) x86_64++ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago Plus ultra! permalink fedilink source parent [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children) imagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch. Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit "bytes" (fyves?) Hoozah! Done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) only if double precision can be called high fyves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* Now imagine designing a 65 bit computer. The bus, registers, alu... You'll probably waste a lotta chips since most of them are designed for working with powers of 2 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) ooh, available for “x86_65” on Alpine (and they’ve fixed that now) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Have you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Finally. 65 bit processor. permalink fedilink source parent [–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 years ago (1 child) x86_64++ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago Plus ultra! permalink fedilink source parent [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children) imagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch. Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit "bytes" (fyves?) Hoozah! Done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) only if double precision can be called high fyves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* Now imagine designing a 65 bit computer. The bus, registers, alu... You'll probably waste a lotta chips since most of them are designed for working with powers of 2 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 38 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Have you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Finally. 65 bit processor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 years ago (1 child) x86_64++ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago Plus ultra! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children) imagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch. Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit "bytes" (fyves?) Hoozah! Done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) only if double precision can be called high fyves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* Now imagine designing a 65 bit computer. The bus, registers, alu... You'll probably waste a lotta chips since most of them are designed for working with powers of 2 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch. Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit "bytes" (fyves?) Hoozah! Done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) only if double precision can be called high fyves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) only if double precision can be called high fyves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This is a mandatory rule now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* Now imagine designing a 65 bit computer. The bus, registers, alu... You'll probably waste a lotta chips since most of them are designed for working with powers of 2 permalink fedilink source parent