β² 1710 βΌ GNU-Linux (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 2 years ago by nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 240 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 years ago (3 children) Without the mention of mansplain and womansplain this would be funny permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] Luccus@feddit.de 67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I work in IT and sometimes I have to explain something to a user who is somewhat tech-illiterate. Even developers may have significant blind spots when it comes to their OS or networking, for example. So, if I notice it, I'll change some terminology and I may explain instructions differently or use metaphors so every user understands what I'm saying. And most coworkers do the same thing. Here's why I bring this up: For whatever reason, some colleagues give female coworkers the same treatment. And that's weird. If someone is constantly treated like this, they should be allowed to rant about it on their blog. I'm fine with snark if it geht's a point across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it bad if I tend to do this except to everyone because I don't generally expect people to know the same specific stuff as me? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Luccus@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No. If it's everyone, then it's everyone and at worst it's not the most efficient way to communicate. I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird. But if it's "The internet won't start" vs "Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set", then I think it's reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Oh yeah definitely. With that second one, is be requesting explanation for myself! It's really just that when I start to say anything about anything I'm interested in, I get a "why do you think I know anything about that?" a lot, so I shifted gears to the opposite early in life. I go explaining all the things involved with what I'm talking about before I get to the point and people think I'm tangential. permalink fedilink source parent [β] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I love the examples! permalink fedilink source parent [β] Corgana@startrek.website 30 points 2 years ago hey look its the guy from the meme permalink fedilink source parent [β] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago That's fine. It's proof that both exist and one is deadly. Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Luccus@feddit.de 67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I work in IT and sometimes I have to explain something to a user who is somewhat tech-illiterate. Even developers may have significant blind spots when it comes to their OS or networking, for example. So, if I notice it, I'll change some terminology and I may explain instructions differently or use metaphors so every user understands what I'm saying. And most coworkers do the same thing. Here's why I bring this up: For whatever reason, some colleagues give female coworkers the same treatment. And that's weird. If someone is constantly treated like this, they should be allowed to rant about it on their blog. I'm fine with snark if it geht's a point across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it bad if I tend to do this except to everyone because I don't generally expect people to know the same specific stuff as me? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Luccus@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No. If it's everyone, then it's everyone and at worst it's not the most efficient way to communicate. I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird. But if it's "The internet won't start" vs "Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set", then I think it's reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Oh yeah definitely. With that second one, is be requesting explanation for myself! It's really just that when I start to say anything about anything I'm interested in, I get a "why do you think I know anything about that?" a lot, so I shifted gears to the opposite early in life. I go explaining all the things involved with what I'm talking about before I get to the point and people think I'm tangential. permalink fedilink source parent [β] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I love the examples! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Mango@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is it bad if I tend to do this except to everyone because I don't generally expect people to know the same specific stuff as me? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Luccus@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No. If it's everyone, then it's everyone and at worst it's not the most efficient way to communicate. I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird. But if it's "The internet won't start" vs "Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set", then I think it's reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Oh yeah definitely. With that second one, is be requesting explanation for myself! It's really just that when I start to say anything about anything I'm interested in, I get a "why do you think I know anything about that?" a lot, so I shifted gears to the opposite early in life. I go explaining all the things involved with what I'm talking about before I get to the point and people think I'm tangential. permalink fedilink source parent [β] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I love the examples! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Luccus@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No. If it's everyone, then it's everyone and at worst it's not the most efficient way to communicate. I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird. But if it's "The internet won't start" vs "Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set", then I think it's reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Oh yeah definitely. With that second one, is be requesting explanation for myself! It's really just that when I start to say anything about anything I'm interested in, I get a "why do you think I know anything about that?" a lot, so I shifted gears to the opposite early in life. I go explaining all the things involved with what I'm talking about before I get to the point and people think I'm tangential. permalink fedilink source parent [β] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I love the examples! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Oh yeah definitely. With that second one, is be requesting explanation for myself! It's really just that when I start to say anything about anything I'm interested in, I get a "why do you think I know anything about that?" a lot, so I shifted gears to the opposite early in life. I go explaining all the things involved with what I'm talking about before I get to the point and people think I'm tangential. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago I love the examples! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Corgana@startrek.website 30 points 2 years ago hey look its the guy from the meme permalink fedilink source parent
[β] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago That's fine. It's proof that both exist and one is deadly. Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent