▲ 900 ▼ Stone Rule (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 years ago by poplargrove@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn’t help the message Really? Because I'm seeing it being talked about a lot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Debating the method of the performance is not the same as compelling people to learn about climate change and join protests. If anything, it has the opposite effect. It’s only compelling to those already in the fold, and therefore counterproductive to the cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago It's also leading to discussions between those complaining about and those "already in the fold", facilitating the spread of information. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is though. We're talking about it now, but responding your disproving your own theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone having this particular exact discussion is already convinced, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Probably not or there wouldn't be discussion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago Conversations on a public platform aren’t just for those who speak; they’re also for those who listen. Many people are simply reading these exchanges without engaging in them. I think this discourse is most valuable for them, far more valuable than for someone whose opinion is so ingrained that they’re the one arguing about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Debating the method of the performance is not the same as compelling people to learn about climate change and join protests. If anything, it has the opposite effect. It’s only compelling to those already in the fold, and therefore counterproductive to the cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago It's also leading to discussions between those complaining about and those "already in the fold", facilitating the spread of information. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is though. We're talking about it now, but responding your disproving your own theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone having this particular exact discussion is already convinced, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Probably not or there wouldn't be discussion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago Conversations on a public platform aren’t just for those who speak; they’re also for those who listen. Many people are simply reading these exchanges without engaging in them. I think this discourse is most valuable for them, far more valuable than for someone whose opinion is so ingrained that they’re the one arguing about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago It's also leading to discussions between those complaining about and those "already in the fold", facilitating the spread of information. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It is though. We're talking about it now, but responding your disproving your own theory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone having this particular exact discussion is already convinced, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Probably not or there wouldn't be discussion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago Conversations on a public platform aren’t just for those who speak; they’re also for those who listen. Many people are simply reading these exchanges without engaging in them. I think this discourse is most valuable for them, far more valuable than for someone whose opinion is so ingrained that they’re the one arguing about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone having this particular exact discussion is already convinced, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Probably not or there wouldn't be discussion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago Conversations on a public platform aren’t just for those who speak; they’re also for those who listen. Many people are simply reading these exchanges without engaging in them. I think this discourse is most valuable for them, far more valuable than for someone whose opinion is so ingrained that they’re the one arguing about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Probably not or there wouldn't be discussion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago Conversations on a public platform aren’t just for those who speak; they’re also for those who listen. Many people are simply reading these exchanges without engaging in them. I think this discourse is most valuable for them, far more valuable than for someone whose opinion is so ingrained that they’re the one arguing about it. permalink fedilink source parent