you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

What is the point of chili without meat? It would just be a bowl of beans and spices (or just a bowl of spices since beans really don't belong in chili).

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I know I'm a year late, but this is important to address: Chili is a bean dish. Meat is optional, beans are not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Whoever told you that was very wrong. Chili was originally a meat and chili pepper dish. Adding beans is Tex Mex and came later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If chili is a meat dish, why would there be a variant called "chili con carne"? If you don't speak Spanish, that means "chili with meat".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I like how you couldn't even be bothered to read the very first sentence in the Wikipedia article. If you did, then you'd understand just how wrong you are.

    Drop your ego and just let it go, man. I really don't care that much (everybody makes mistakes), so neither should you.

    Please just read the article, and stop bothering me. If you reply again, I won't even read it. ✌️

  • source
  • parent