▲ 125 ▼ Scientists propose converting natural gas into hydrogen directly in gas fields (techxplore.com) submitted 2 years ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/technology@lemmy.world 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Devdogg@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, something about this screams at me it's not right. Why wouldn't this work? What would go wrong? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Producing hydrogen from natural gas still releases carbon in to the air. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) ...which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO2 in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Producing hydrogen from natural gas still releases carbon in to the air. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) ...which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO2 in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) ...which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO2 in there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That used to be my thinking, but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) but there's a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited Sooooo money. That's the exception to doing the right thing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work [S] 1 point 2 years ago You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we're under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition. permalink fedilink source parent