10
anti-snap stance is anti-consumer (lemdro.id)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The title is a quote from Mastodon. I’ve always seen dislike towards snap so I was taken back when I saw this stance. The person who wrote this was referring to Tuxedo Laptops.

What are your thoughts on this?

EDIT:

Here’s the original comment: https://mastodon.social/@popey/112591863166141029

EDIT 2:

Some clarification for those accusing me of not following the thread or being disingenuous.

Didn't bother to follow the thread?

https://mastodon.social/@popey/112593520847827981

I posted my question here before this particular response from the OP. I asked the question on Lemmy out of interest and wanting to get a wider perspective. I also engaged with the OP on the thread so that I can get their perspective on their stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago*

This is another issue with:

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/46

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak.github.io/issues/191

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1651

Others like valve have just ignored the issue for years, but the flatpak devs decided to argue that it doesn't apply to them, to the point that one even mentioned modifying the spec so that they are exempt...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent