people have been demonizing it for most of the AD years i think but it's quite pleasant really. are there any proven negative effects?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What has circumcision to do with sexual pleasure? Please do explain. I'm circumcised and I have no loss of sensation from not having foreskin. I also don't have a moist area for bacteria to multiply

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Where you circumcized after you became sexually active?

    If not, how would you know there is no loss?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Same with all of you. None of you would know the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There are people that were circumcized after becoming sexually active who can (and do) report exactly that.

    Separately, we can simply ask people that have foreskins to describe the sensations they feel from that body part.

    The only part that we can't say with confidence is how the neutral pathways develop (i.e. how we perceive the sensations) when it's the only way we've ever experienced.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago
    • keratinization of the glans
    • loss of the gliding sensation between the penis and the foreskin during penetration
    • loss of the Meissner corpuscles in the foreskin

    About the multiplication of bacteria in a moist area, how do you handle that in your mouth ? Surgery or personal hygiene?

  • source
  • parent