▲ 508 ▼ Microsoft is reworking Recall after researchers point out its security problems (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by Spotlight7573@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments the company says that Recall will be opt-in by default, so users will need to decide to turn it on
[+] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, it's not. Check your priorities. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, it is. Easily. It's that invasive. It will record your porn if you use a functional browser instead of edge. It will record your nudes if you ever see them on your PC. And on top of that, it will also record all sorts of other sensitive personal information that can be used for identity theft if you just do basic shit like using banking websites. Looking at your passwords at some point in your life is also perfectly normal behavior, and it will expose that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is more akin to you taking a picture of your own junk in a public bathroom stall. Or using face unlock while you're on the toilet. Obviously nobody's gonna win in an internet argument but you should really take a look at the extremes with which you view this stuff. /Serious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Only if your phone is moving that picture to a place that's very easy for anyone who wants to get. The user is not doing shit. The operating system is massively compromising their expectation of privacy by packaging all their sensitive activity into an easy to grab and go bundle. Viewing actual extreme behavior as extreme is how it's supposed to work. This is obscenely invasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, it is. Easily. It's that invasive. It will record your porn if you use a functional browser instead of edge. It will record your nudes if you ever see them on your PC. And on top of that, it will also record all sorts of other sensitive personal information that can be used for identity theft if you just do basic shit like using banking websites. Looking at your passwords at some point in your life is also perfectly normal behavior, and it will expose that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is more akin to you taking a picture of your own junk in a public bathroom stall. Or using face unlock while you're on the toilet. Obviously nobody's gonna win in an internet argument but you should really take a look at the extremes with which you view this stuff. /Serious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Only if your phone is moving that picture to a place that's very easy for anyone who wants to get. The user is not doing shit. The operating system is massively compromising their expectation of privacy by packaging all their sensitive activity into an easy to grab and go bundle. Viewing actual extreme behavior as extreme is how it's supposed to work. This is obscenely invasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is more akin to you taking a picture of your own junk in a public bathroom stall. Or using face unlock while you're on the toilet. Obviously nobody's gonna win in an internet argument but you should really take a look at the extremes with which you view this stuff. /Serious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Only if your phone is moving that picture to a place that's very easy for anyone who wants to get. The user is not doing shit. The operating system is massively compromising their expectation of privacy by packaging all their sensitive activity into an easy to grab and go bundle. Viewing actual extreme behavior as extreme is how it's supposed to work. This is obscenely invasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Only if your phone is moving that picture to a place that's very easy for anyone who wants to get. The user is not doing shit. The operating system is massively compromising their expectation of privacy by packaging all their sensitive activity into an easy to grab and go bundle. Viewing actual extreme behavior as extreme is how it's supposed to work. This is obscenely invasive. permalink fedilink source parent