▲ 510 ▼ Humane is said to be seeking a $1 billion buyout after only 10,000 orders of its terrible AI Pin (www.engadget.com) submitted 2 years ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm sure there's some MBA douche stupid enough to buy it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -32 points 2 years ago (4 children) I could see Apple buying it. The form factor makes sense, it's the fact that it relies on AI and has its own cell connection are the main issues. If I could tap it and have Siri take dictation or take a picture of something to get more information it would be pretty neat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) Apple already have the perfect form factor, it’s called a phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Or, if you want something smaller, they have a watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Or if you want something bigger they have glasses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I don't wear a watch? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 years ago Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch. permalink fedilink source parent [–] capital@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does. I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want. permalink fedilink source parent [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin. Apple's got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you've got the phone so you can use the headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] farcaller@fstab.sh 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There's no point in such a device at all, then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -32 points 2 years ago (4 children) I could see Apple buying it. The form factor makes sense, it's the fact that it relies on AI and has its own cell connection are the main issues. If I could tap it and have Siri take dictation or take a picture of something to get more information it would be pretty neat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) Apple already have the perfect form factor, it’s called a phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Or, if you want something smaller, they have a watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Or if you want something bigger they have glasses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I don't wear a watch? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 years ago Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch. permalink fedilink source parent [–] capital@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does. I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want. permalink fedilink source parent [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin. Apple's got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you've got the phone so you can use the headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] farcaller@fstab.sh 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There's no point in such a device at all, then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) Apple already have the perfect form factor, it’s called a phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Or, if you want something smaller, they have a watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Or if you want something bigger they have glasses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I don't wear a watch? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Or, if you want something smaller, they have a watch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Or if you want something bigger they have glasses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I don't wear a watch? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Or if you want something bigger they have glasses. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I don't wear a watch? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Then you'll have to look elsewhere when you want to know what time it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 years ago Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] capital@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does. I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin. Apple's got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you've got the phone so you can use the headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] farcaller@fstab.sh 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There's no point in such a device at all, then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin. Apple's got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you've got the phone so you can use the headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] farcaller@fstab.sh 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There's no point in such a device at all, then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] farcaller@fstab.sh 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There's no point in such a device at all, then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Airpods don't have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain. And I don't have Airpods because I'd lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It's not a technical problem, it's just a stupid idea, it's not an ergonomic place to use a camera. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don't think it does, at least for now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stonehopper@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Why? There's no internet connection on it, so the only way to get media on or off is via the micro SD card. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago Which would be great if I wore a watch, but I don't permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What about the Meta Ray bands? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Sunglasses are very easy to lose. I'm considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost. I just wish they weren't meta linked. permalink fedilink source parent