▲ 67 ▼ rule (beehaw.org) submitted 2 years ago by Stoneblackdog@beehaw.org to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 years ago (5 children) Well let's break it down: 🍔 + 🍔 + 🍔 = 18 3🍔 = 18 🍔 = 6 🍔 + (🍟 • 🍟) = 5 6 + 🍟^2 = 5 🍟^2 = -1 🍟 = I 🥤^🍟 - 🥤 = 3 🥤^i-1 = 3 🥤 = 3^1/(i-1) Simple! permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] fri@compuverse.uk 27 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wait, what happened in the second to last bullet point? You can't convert a power like that when subtracting (you can when dividing). It's like you'd convert "2^4 - 2" into "2^(4-1)", which gives two different results (14 vs 8). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* For those curious, I threw 🥤^i - 🥤 = 3 into wolfram. 🥤 ≈ -2.97983 + 0.0388569 i... or 🥤 ≈ 0.27972 - 0.748461 i... permalink fedilink source parent [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago You're right, idk what I was thinking there 😕 permalink fedilink source parent [–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 14 points 2 years ago I think they're saying no one can give the real answer to this... which is technically true because the answer is imaginary. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Rin@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago Bah, yes I forgot about that permalink fedilink source parent [–] ichmagrum@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago* 🍟 = I Don't you mean 🍟 = i? permalink fedilink source parent [–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And just like that, I'm back to junior high grumbling about the concept of imaginary numbers. Fuck you, y'all made up! 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago Lol I didn't quite get my math right, but it still involves imaginary numbers. Fun fact! Any 3D game you've played in the past probably quarter century doesn't just use 1 dimension of imaginary numbers, but 3 to represent 3D rotation! Quaternions are difficult to visualize since it's a 4-dimensional quantity but they're perfect for representing rotation in 3D space without suffering from gimbal lock like rotation matrices. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fri@compuverse.uk 27 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wait, what happened in the second to last bullet point? You can't convert a power like that when subtracting (you can when dividing). It's like you'd convert "2^4 - 2" into "2^(4-1)", which gives two different results (14 vs 8). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] usrtrv@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* For those curious, I threw 🥤^i - 🥤 = 3 into wolfram. 🥤 ≈ -2.97983 + 0.0388569 i... or 🥤 ≈ 0.27972 - 0.748461 i... permalink fedilink source parent [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago You're right, idk what I was thinking there 😕 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] usrtrv@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* For those curious, I threw 🥤^i - 🥤 = 3 into wolfram. 🥤 ≈ -2.97983 + 0.0388569 i... or 🥤 ≈ 0.27972 - 0.748461 i... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago You're right, idk what I was thinking there 😕 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 14 points 2 years ago I think they're saying no one can give the real answer to this... which is technically true because the answer is imaginary. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rin@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago Bah, yes I forgot about that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago Bah, yes I forgot about that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ichmagrum@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago* 🍟 = I Don't you mean 🍟 = i? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And just like that, I'm back to junior high grumbling about the concept of imaginary numbers. Fuck you, y'all made up! 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago Lol I didn't quite get my math right, but it still involves imaginary numbers. Fun fact! Any 3D game you've played in the past probably quarter century doesn't just use 1 dimension of imaginary numbers, but 3 to represent 3D rotation! Quaternions are difficult to visualize since it's a 4-dimensional quantity but they're perfect for representing rotation in 3D space without suffering from gimbal lock like rotation matrices. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago Lol I didn't quite get my math right, but it still involves imaginary numbers. Fun fact! Any 3D game you've played in the past probably quarter century doesn't just use 1 dimension of imaginary numbers, but 3 to represent 3D rotation! Quaternions are difficult to visualize since it's a 4-dimensional quantity but they're perfect for representing rotation in 3D space without suffering from gimbal lock like rotation matrices. permalink fedilink source parent