▲ 75 ▼ Study says Europeans fear migration more than climate change – DW – 05/08/2024 (www.dw.com) submitted 2 years ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I think its not ethical to just let in everyone who was born in a third world country. That doesnt even make sense, its just not sustainable, fucks a lot of things up, and doesnt solve problems for anyone. It makes their country worse, make our country worse, what is the plan here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago The alternative would be helping those countries most affected to prevent migrations from happening. In practice, that would look like giving them [Shitloads] of (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694300/) money . Like, regardless of ethics, those people will not stop existing once climate change makes their homelands unlivable. The two available plans appear to be "solve climate change as rapidly as possible and bootstrap poor countries up to developed countries pro Bono" or "shoot migrants at the border". permalink fedilink source parent [+] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I think its not ethical to just let in everyone who was born in a third world country. That doesnt even make sense, its just not sustainable, fucks a lot of things up, and doesnt solve problems for anyone. It makes their country worse, make our country worse, what is the plan here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago The alternative would be helping those countries most affected to prevent migrations from happening. In practice, that would look like giving them [Shitloads] of (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694300/) money . Like, regardless of ethics, those people will not stop existing once climate change makes their homelands unlivable. The two available plans appear to be "solve climate change as rapidly as possible and bootstrap poor countries up to developed countries pro Bono" or "shoot migrants at the border". permalink fedilink source parent [+] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago The alternative would be helping those countries most affected to prevent migrations from happening. In practice, that would look like giving them [Shitloads] of (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694300/) money . Like, regardless of ethics, those people will not stop existing once climate change makes their homelands unlivable. The two available plans appear to be "solve climate change as rapidly as possible and bootstrap poor countries up to developed countries pro Bono" or "shoot migrants at the border". permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent