Technology

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Well, we all know he beats his wife......

...................in monopoly! Give me those brown properties!!!

parent

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why's it gotta be the brown properties?

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] Mercury@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The man loves going to brown town, what's wrong with that?

parent

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

They're the cheapest to aquire, put hotels on, and they're right at the start of the board. If you overshoot go, you're PAYING $250 instead of recieving $200 if you land on baltic. And you, as the owner of the brown properties would either get $250 or $450 everytime.

All for just $610 to buy both, and upgrade them both to hotels.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Statistically, the best properties to have are the ones just after jail. Everyone who passes go still has to pass them, while those who get sent to jail also have I pass them. The organge properties are the best, because the average dice roll is 7 and from jail that lands you right on them.

parent

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago

I'm old enough to remember when they were purple. And the orange ones are great but I think statistically the two reds after free parking are the most landed on square.

parent

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Healthy relationships have ridiculous hall-passes that share at least one person in common.

parent

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

It's not cheating if it's consensual.

parent

[+] Alphonsus@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

[removed by mod]

parent

[+] Coasting0942@reddthat.com -30 points 2 years ago (4 children)

He’ll live long enough to end up on the wrong side of the polygamy rights fight. But I’d like to be surprised.

hideshow 8 child comments

parent

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 2 years ago

I imagine he will be an old and gray man and someone will ask him his opinion and it will probably be like

What? Are you fucking with me? I didn't give a shit what people did behind closed doors 40 years ago, what fuckin made you think I would care now? Are you fucking mental? Did your daddy not love you enough? Get the fuck out of here, your making my blood pressure spike....

parent

[–] huginn@feddit.it 10 points 2 years ago

Polyamory isn't cheating though.

Cheating is, by definition, sex with another person against your partner's will.

parent

[–] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

Polygamy: Mormons, etc. generally opposes womens rights.

Polyamory: Ideally places noone above another, elevates everyone to have the healthy connections such that noone is a "3rd wheel" or more disposable. Less about "polycules" recruiting new members, and more about individuals pairing with new partners, and existing partners (initially at least) gaining a metaphor. Mileage may vary and the point is everyone's needs are a bit different and shouldnt feel pressured to fit neatly into a nuclear box.

Just fyi.

parent

[–] rooroo@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The fuck is that even supposed to mean

parent

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid, giving them all parental rights. Religious right will have their scheduled stroke. Most of the population won’t care. Internet trolls will be screaming how it’s a United Nations plan to depopulate the planet.

Or basically any legal recognition for polygamy.

parent

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid

…Is that even possible? I thought humans could only have exactly two parents biologically? If I didn’t misunderstand, I’m legit curious about this.

parent

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

We’ve already reached two lesbians with their combined dna being carried by a surrogate (which has extra dna effects as the carrier). With further dna advancements it should be possible to mix up multiple parents dna.

parent

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Is it this one? I’m far from an expert but it seems like they used a different part of DNA from each woman, I doubt it’s possible to go beyond 3 parents with the same method.