▲ 931 ▼ Lots of times the restaurants won't even have milk (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 277 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world [S] 5 points 2 years ago* (2 children) They weren't biologically made to drink alcohol or eat big macs their whole lives either yet here you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah, this is a hella weird comment in an alcohol thread. That stuff is actually toxic, and popular mainly because of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's with Lemmy's obsession with water? Most people know that water is the best thing to drink but this site is preachy as fuck about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago The hydrohomies are all grown up, I guess? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I haven't actually seen that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone knows alcohol is poison. Not many people know the side effects of drinking too much milk. You could actually become addicted to it and it would become a problem. I had a friend who had some trouble with it, which is why I typed that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago You're getting downvoted but you're actually correct. My grandfather was told by his doctor not to drink so much milk. He drank at least 3 glasses a day. I forget why but if you're telling an 85 yo to stop doing something as a doctor, it probably has some bad short-term effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Source? Addictive milk is kind of "out of left field" for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ I don't know how true this is, but I pulled this quote: Indeed, the results suggest that milk is more addictive than cigarettes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Very true, yet lactose intolerance is quite common among humans. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah, this is a hella weird comment in an alcohol thread. That stuff is actually toxic, and popular mainly because of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's with Lemmy's obsession with water? Most people know that water is the best thing to drink but this site is preachy as fuck about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago The hydrohomies are all grown up, I guess? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I haven't actually seen that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone knows alcohol is poison. Not many people know the side effects of drinking too much milk. You could actually become addicted to it and it would become a problem. I had a friend who had some trouble with it, which is why I typed that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago You're getting downvoted but you're actually correct. My grandfather was told by his doctor not to drink so much milk. He drank at least 3 glasses a day. I forget why but if you're telling an 85 yo to stop doing something as a doctor, it probably has some bad short-term effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Source? Addictive milk is kind of "out of left field" for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ I don't know how true this is, but I pulled this quote: Indeed, the results suggest that milk is more addictive than cigarettes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's with Lemmy's obsession with water? Most people know that water is the best thing to drink but this site is preachy as fuck about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago The hydrohomies are all grown up, I guess? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I haven't actually seen that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 years ago The hydrohomies are all grown up, I guess? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I haven't actually seen that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Everyone knows alcohol is poison. Not many people know the side effects of drinking too much milk. You could actually become addicted to it and it would become a problem. I had a friend who had some trouble with it, which is why I typed that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago You're getting downvoted but you're actually correct. My grandfather was told by his doctor not to drink so much milk. He drank at least 3 glasses a day. I forget why but if you're telling an 85 yo to stop doing something as a doctor, it probably has some bad short-term effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Source? Addictive milk is kind of "out of left field" for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ I don't know how true this is, but I pulled this quote: Indeed, the results suggest that milk is more addictive than cigarettes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago You're getting downvoted but you're actually correct. My grandfather was told by his doctor not to drink so much milk. He drank at least 3 glasses a day. I forget why but if you're telling an 85 yo to stop doing something as a doctor, it probably has some bad short-term effects permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Source? Addictive milk is kind of "out of left field" for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ I don't know how true this is, but I pulled this quote: Indeed, the results suggest that milk is more addictive than cigarettes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ I don't know how true this is, but I pulled this quote: Indeed, the results suggest that milk is more addictive than cigarettes. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive. This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It's supposed to be ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's my mistake! Had company and posted something I didn't read. My apologies. Maybe I can learn something from this article then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Hey, no worries. It happens. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Very true, yet lactose intolerance is quite common among humans. permalink fedilink source parent
