▲ 52 ▼ Huawei's homegrown operating system, launched after the company was put on a U.S. blacklist, may soon overtake Apple's iOS in China (fortune.com) submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Thanks, we definitely did not need any further information or sources from your reply. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) I keep forgetting that using google is challenging for people https://www.openharmony.cn/mainPlay/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought everyone decided “jfgi” in online discourse was a toxic years ago. It’s the same attitude as : chemtrails make you sick! How so? go do your own research If you’re going report on something, provide a little more information than just “no”. It’s more helpful, better for the community, and in 5 years time when the facts are different, there’ll still be a reference of what was factual in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago The flip side of this argument is people asking for references for things that are well known and completely not controversial, as happens to be the case here. We're not talking about some conspiracy theory. We're talking about the basic fact that OpenHarmony exists, and this fact is trivially verifiable. This is known as sealoining. permalink fedilink source parent [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] YeetPics@mander.xyz -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Get used to it, this guy is terminally online. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 2 years ago aww my favorite troll is back permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Thanks, we definitely did not need any further information or sources from your reply. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) I keep forgetting that using google is challenging for people https://www.openharmony.cn/mainPlay/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought everyone decided “jfgi” in online discourse was a toxic years ago. It’s the same attitude as : chemtrails make you sick! How so? go do your own research If you’re going report on something, provide a little more information than just “no”. It’s more helpful, better for the community, and in 5 years time when the facts are different, there’ll still be a reference of what was factual in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago The flip side of this argument is people asking for references for things that are well known and completely not controversial, as happens to be the case here. We're not talking about some conspiracy theory. We're talking about the basic fact that OpenHarmony exists, and this fact is trivially verifiable. This is known as sealoining. permalink fedilink source parent [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] YeetPics@mander.xyz -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Get used to it, this guy is terminally online. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 2 years ago aww my favorite troll is back permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) I keep forgetting that using google is challenging for people https://www.openharmony.cn/mainPlay/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought everyone decided “jfgi” in online discourse was a toxic years ago. It’s the same attitude as : chemtrails make you sick! How so? go do your own research If you’re going report on something, provide a little more information than just “no”. It’s more helpful, better for the community, and in 5 years time when the facts are different, there’ll still be a reference of what was factual in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago The flip side of this argument is people asking for references for things that are well known and completely not controversial, as happens to be the case here. We're not talking about some conspiracy theory. We're talking about the basic fact that OpenHarmony exists, and this fact is trivially verifiable. This is known as sealoining. permalink fedilink source parent [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought everyone decided “jfgi” in online discourse was a toxic years ago. It’s the same attitude as : chemtrails make you sick! How so? go do your own research If you’re going report on something, provide a little more information than just “no”. It’s more helpful, better for the community, and in 5 years time when the facts are different, there’ll still be a reference of what was factual in the past. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago The flip side of this argument is people asking for references for things that are well known and completely not controversial, as happens to be the case here. We're not talking about some conspiracy theory. We're talking about the basic fact that OpenHarmony exists, and this fact is trivially verifiable. This is known as sealoining. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago The flip side of this argument is people asking for references for things that are well known and completely not controversial, as happens to be the case here. We're not talking about some conspiracy theory. We're talking about the basic fact that OpenHarmony exists, and this fact is trivially verifiable. This is known as sealoining. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] YeetPics@mander.xyz -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Get used to it, this guy is terminally online. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 2 years ago aww my favorite troll is back permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 7 points 2 years ago aww my favorite troll is back permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent