Some folks on here have been repeating this garbage as well

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

By which logic? What specific sentence gave you the impression that I think we should increase immigration targets?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If the path to ensure that is not allowing them to immigrate, it really is impossible to spin this as anything else than anti-immigration…

    If you're not allowing everyone who wants to immigrate here the opportunity - isn't that anti-immigration?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    It depends on which kind of debate you’re having and which definitions you’re starting from.

    I’d say that most people who would call themselves pro-immigration don’t go as far as saying that absolutely anyone should be allowed immigrant status, so I wouldn’t call being against that position anti-immigration.

    I do think that most people who would call themselves pro-immigration would agree that it’s understandable that provinces can dial up or down on immigration programs of skilled labor depending on economic circumstances. So I wouldn’t say that reducing immigration numbers in any form is an inherently anti-immigration stance either.

    I do think, however, that saying that we should reduce immigration because immigrants are making housing unaffordable is solidly on the anti-immigration side. There’s a pretty intuitive divide here.

  • source
  • parent