this post was submitted on 06 May 2024

810 points (98.2% liked)

News

news@lemmy.world

38,562 readers

9,259 active

1,964 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

Judge finds Donald Trump in contempt for 10th time over gag order and threatens jail time (www.cnn.com)

submitted 2 years ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is the second ruling of contempt

First ruling was collectively over 9 comments he made.

This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

This is still from the first batch of contempt charges. The judge ruled on 9/10 and wanted more information before ruling on the 10th

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

Didn't they say that after the first as well?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago

And they'll say it again after the next.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

So, if I am understanding correctly, as a citizen I can threaten a judge 9 times, or threaten 9 different judges, and demand that I can only be held accountable for only one of them, or for all of them as a package only once?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

No, you are not understanding it correctly.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Feel free to explain then, because from here it looks like El Trumpo should have been thrown to jail 8 contempts ago, like any normal citizen. Right now if I was a US citizen I would be justified in citing precedent that I can't be sent to jail or even threatened with jail time with only 6 contempts.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

No thanks

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.3