124
Lix - a new fork of Nix (lix.systems)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://chaos.social/@ktemkin/112392108881500298

https://chaos.social/@ktemkin/112392108893774195

This isn’t just a fork of Nix—this is the work of a team of 10+ people near-constantly since early February. (Technically, us too — but our task is really just enabling others.)

Some serious work has gone into ensuring it improves on upstream without having the regressions that have plagued them last three major versions!

And, since this will matter to some — it’s not a project of the NixOS foundation, but an independent organization that takes its responsibility to its community seriously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 33 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

https://forum.aux.computer/t/the-future-of-nixcpp-lix/483

The announcement resolves one of my last fears for Aux: development on Nix itself. It is no secret that the number of people knowledgeable about the project and are willing to work on this CPP codebase is small. You have probably seen me mention multiple times by now that @sig_cli needs all of the help that we can get. Lix resolves this entirely with a trusted team of experts. This means that Aux is now able to remove Nix development from our priorities and can instead collaborate with Lix moving forward.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    I think that's backwards. Lix is a replacement for the nix package manager, while aux is a replacement for NixOS.

    Aux looks like it will now use Lix for it's package manager, instead of trying to make its own fork of nix.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent