▲ 304 ▼ Steam features never fail to amaze me (programming.dev) submitted 2 years ago* by pro_grammer@programming.dev to c/steam@lemmy.ml 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) is your other device connected via telegraph wire? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Luccajan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe it's the read or write speed of the drives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The CPU on the source used for compression is definitely the bottleneck for me. Internet is faster. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TechAdmin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I think it's because Steam compresses the data before sending it and limits CPU usage. I still use local file transfer between desktop and Steam Deck because rarely in much of a rush. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) For me, it’s the same either way. I’m capped off at 120MB/sec whether LAN or internet! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Same, I'm still too cheap to upgrade the LAN to 10 Gbit/s. I could theoretically get old stuff from work, but that's all 19 inch rack mountable and loud... permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Luccajan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe it's the read or write speed of the drives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The CPU on the source used for compression is definitely the bottleneck for me. Internet is faster. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TechAdmin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I think it's because Steam compresses the data before sending it and limits CPU usage. I still use local file transfer between desktop and Steam Deck because rarely in much of a rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Luccajan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe it's the read or write speed of the drives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The CPU on the source used for compression is definitely the bottleneck for me. Internet is faster. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The CPU on the source used for compression is definitely the bottleneck for me. Internet is faster. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago The CPU on the source used for compression is definitely the bottleneck for me. Internet is faster. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TechAdmin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I think it's because Steam compresses the data before sending it and limits CPU usage. I still use local file transfer between desktop and Steam Deck because rarely in much of a rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) For me, it’s the same either way. I’m capped off at 120MB/sec whether LAN or internet! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Same, I'm still too cheap to upgrade the LAN to 10 Gbit/s. I could theoretically get old stuff from work, but that's all 19 inch rack mountable and loud... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago Same, I'm still too cheap to upgrade the LAN to 10 Gbit/s. I could theoretically get old stuff from work, but that's all 19 inch rack mountable and loud... permalink fedilink source parent