324
AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing | Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/news@lemmy.world
154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A controversial bill that would require all new cars to be fitted with AM radios looks set to become a law in the near future. Yesterday, Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass) revealed that the "AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act" now has the support of 60 US Senators, as well as 246 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, making its passage an almost sure thing. Should that happen, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would be required to ensure that all new cars sold in the US had AM radios at no extra cost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

So. This bill is meant to force manufacturers to put am radios inside new cars.

Right?

New cars that, in a hypothetical emp… will be just as fried as your cell phone is.

And that’s why the emergency prep angle doesn’t hold water. You would literally be better off with a hand crank emergency radio (that can almost certainly survive.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    And if AM is removed from cars (AM's biggest listening base) it will die. If AM radio dies, then the hand crank emergency radio will have no use. Much like the portable UHF/VHF television.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Because there’s no possible way that the government could buy up the 77 stations thst broadcast the NPWS stations.

    We’re already subsidizing them heavily because the backup systems to keep them on are expensive.

    Edit to add: the demand for AM is going away. Content is cheaper to produce and distribute online.

    In stead of passing legislation to bail out a dying industry (what this bill is really about,) they should be looking at ways of resolving the problem.

    An easy first step is to buy or otherwise nationalize the 77 critical stations. We can then either maintain them as vital infrastructure or replace them with newer and more capable/effective technologies.

    All this bill is going to do is prolong the problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Gotcha... And just for funsies, how much money (taxpayer money) have we spent on say... failing banks? I'd say investing zero tax payer dollars to "save" AM radio is a better investment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    But we’re not going to be able to save AM radio.

    Outside of rural areas, AM radio has no advantage over cell based internet services. It’s less expensive for the content producers, and it’s inevitable that they switch to streaming instead of broadcast.

    And those rural areas don’t provide the audience necessary to sustain the cost of the broadcast service.

    Further this bill isn’t without cost- that cost is being paid by everyone who buys a car.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent