▲ 783 ▼ We can do all three things at once (yiffit.net) submitted 2 years ago by Forester@yiffit.net to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 228 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Sniatch@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (4 children) But its also possible without nuclear waste. You are just pushing the problems with the waste to the future generations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one who makes decisions so far has cared about future generations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water boiling maschine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Nearly every power plant ever, including green ones, is an overly expensive water boiling machine permalink fedilink source parent [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I'm actually pushing for degrowth. It's the simplest path to ending oil use permalink fedilink source parent [–] atro_city@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) There needs to be a future generation to push it onto first... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Forester@yiffit.net [S] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You and your fearmongering is the problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Star@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Nuclear fuel came from the ground, it can go back in the ground. Future generations aren’t going to be impacted by nuclear waste storage. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago What problem? If they're stupid enough to dig it back up, they get what's coming to em permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) No one who makes decisions so far has cared about future generations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water boiling maschine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Nearly every power plant ever, including green ones, is an overly expensive water boiling machine permalink fedilink source parent [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I'm actually pushing for degrowth. It's the simplest path to ending oil use permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children) Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water boiling maschine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Nearly every power plant ever, including green ones, is an overly expensive water boiling machine permalink fedilink source parent [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I'm actually pushing for degrowth. It's the simplest path to ending oil use permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago Nearly every power plant ever, including green ones, is an overly expensive water boiling machine permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I'm actually pushing for degrowth. It's the simplest path to ending oil use permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) There needs to be a future generation to push it onto first... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Forester@yiffit.net [S] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You and your fearmongering is the problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Forester@yiffit.net [S] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You and your fearmongering is the problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Forester@yiffit.net [S] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You and your fearmongering is the problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Star@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Nuclear fuel came from the ground, it can go back in the ground. Future generations aren’t going to be impacted by nuclear waste storage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago What problem? If they're stupid enough to dig it back up, they get what's coming to em permalink fedilink source parent
