Perhaps the 84 second burn overflowed the integer (2^6) and was caught by a 2^7s check (127s)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

The tweet you link didn't indicate that. It said that an engine failure likely caused the overrun, running for 127 seconds instead of the planned 84. Why would something have a 2^7 int size check?

Edit: Quoted

The head of Roscosmos Yuri Borisov said that the main cause of the #Luna25 crash was an engine failure. Instead of the planned 84 seconds, he worked 127 seconds.

Am I missing something?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There's further discussion of possible explanations in the replies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments