▲ 378 ▼ Game devs praise Steam as a 'democratic platform' that 'continues to be transformative' for PC gaming today (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 2 years ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/games@sh.itjust.works 78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Corporate tactic, very secret: Don't self-destruct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) But if we don’t self-destruct, how do we create value for shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jackinopolis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) No shareholders if you aren't publicly owned. Stakeholders, yeah probably, but no shareholders. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren't traded publicly... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would love to learn more about Valve's actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) But if we don’t self-destruct, how do we create value for shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jackinopolis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) No shareholders if you aren't publicly owned. Stakeholders, yeah probably, but no shareholders. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren't traded publicly... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would love to learn more about Valve's actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jackinopolis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) No shareholders if you aren't publicly owned. Stakeholders, yeah probably, but no shareholders. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren't traded publicly... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would love to learn more about Valve's actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can still have shareholders in a private company, those shares just aren't traded publicly... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would love to learn more about Valve's actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I would love to learn more about Valve's actual numbers, but not enough to wish them going public and fucking up the one thing that continues to work as advertised in the world. permalink fedilink source parent