▲ 216 ▼ Baldur's Gate 3 minmaxer finds terrifying 240 damage-per-turn Monk build, carrying on D&D's long tradition of rules-based ultraviolence (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 2 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/baldurs_gate_3@lemmy.world 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments Standing here, I realise.
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) They've been around since AD&D, which is almost the very beginning, yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Good old Magic User class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* "Mystic", to be fair, was what the OG system called them, but then AD&D was the first edition to use the term "monk", and each subsequent edition has had some form of the class present in either the PHB or supplemental texts. Technically, 1st Edition D&D did not have Monk as a player class. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Good old Magic User class. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* "Mystic", to be fair, was what the OG system called them, but then AD&D was the first edition to use the term "monk", and each subsequent edition has had some form of the class present in either the PHB or supplemental texts. Technically, 1st Edition D&D did not have Monk as a player class. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* "Mystic", to be fair, was what the OG system called them, but then AD&D was the first edition to use the term "monk", and each subsequent edition has had some form of the class present in either the PHB or supplemental texts. Technically, 1st Edition D&D did not have Monk as a player class. permalink fedilink source parent