▲ 152 ▼ If a universal basic income started today with the stipulation that you had to put 40 hrs/wk towards making the world a better place or solving societal problems, how would you spend your time? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by njordomir@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's a hypothetical question, read the room 🙄. He's just asking what you would do if you were tasked with making the world a better place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 8 points 2 years ago* (3 children) If that was the case, they would have asked the question you did. But they didn't. They asked a different question. You're assuming their intent based on your own preconceptions. A common cause for miscommunication and confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if they had asked that question, a lot of people would say things like "How can I spend 40 hours a week making the world a better place when I'm stuck working this shitty job to barely pay for my life?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago* I didn't comment on the quality of, or potential responses to, the new question. You're also assuming something different than the words I used. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe they weren't expecting a bunch of pedantic responses? lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Maybe. But you and I don't know that. You're guessing their meaning, rather than accepting their words as written. You're trying to mind read, rather than word read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent [–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Reading your reply right now is really funny because the OP replied to the same person after you did saying "You heard what I meant" permalink fedilink source parent [–] njordomir@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 2 years ago You heard what I meant and I appreciate that. It was poorly phrased and I wish I had explained the theoretical better. I qualified it with the "naturally industrious" thing because I wanted people to talk about what they'd do after they slept off the drudgery of current capitalism not immediately upon finding out they don't have to go to work anymore just to survive and have basic amenities. As you stated, I could have also phrased in an equally bad way where everyone just pointed at their job and said "I have no time or energy". That's the problem. I was trying to filter out the "If I had UBI, I would smoke weed and eat potato chips all day" answers. If I had phrased my question as, "if you had a guaranteed income and were able to use 40hrs a week of your time to make the world a better place, what would you do?" That would have been better. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 8 points 2 years ago* (3 children) If that was the case, they would have asked the question you did. But they didn't. They asked a different question. You're assuming their intent based on your own preconceptions. A common cause for miscommunication and confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if they had asked that question, a lot of people would say things like "How can I spend 40 hours a week making the world a better place when I'm stuck working this shitty job to barely pay for my life?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago* I didn't comment on the quality of, or potential responses to, the new question. You're also assuming something different than the words I used. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe they weren't expecting a bunch of pedantic responses? lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Maybe. But you and I don't know that. You're guessing their meaning, rather than accepting their words as written. You're trying to mind read, rather than word read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent [–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Reading your reply right now is really funny because the OP replied to the same person after you did saying "You heard what I meant" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if they had asked that question, a lot of people would say things like "How can I spend 40 hours a week making the world a better place when I'm stuck working this shitty job to barely pay for my life?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago* I didn't comment on the quality of, or potential responses to, the new question. You're also assuming something different than the words I used. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago* I didn't comment on the quality of, or potential responses to, the new question. You're also assuming something different than the words I used. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe they weren't expecting a bunch of pedantic responses? lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Maybe. But you and I don't know that. You're guessing their meaning, rather than accepting their words as written. You're trying to mind read, rather than word read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Maybe. But you and I don't know that. You're guessing their meaning, rather than accepting their words as written. You're trying to mind read, rather than word read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm applying "context" and "media literacy", you're being pedantic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago* That's another way of saying the same thing. Roughly. Seems we agree on the facts, and simply value them differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Reading your reply right now is really funny because the OP replied to the same person after you did saying "You heard what I meant" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 2 years ago You heard what I meant and I appreciate that. It was poorly phrased and I wish I had explained the theoretical better. I qualified it with the "naturally industrious" thing because I wanted people to talk about what they'd do after they slept off the drudgery of current capitalism not immediately upon finding out they don't have to go to work anymore just to survive and have basic amenities. As you stated, I could have also phrased in an equally bad way where everyone just pointed at their job and said "I have no time or energy". That's the problem. I was trying to filter out the "If I had UBI, I would smoke weed and eat potato chips all day" answers. If I had phrased my question as, "if you had a guaranteed income and were able to use 40hrs a week of your time to make the world a better place, what would you do?" That would have been better. permalink fedilink source parent