you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Again, China does not run the company, they just own the leash on the private entrepreneurs who do. That's one of Deng's benefits for implementing capitalism. (mildlyinteresting: the word capitalism isn't capitalized)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    China has a massive stake in the company. It's a huge investment for them. Hardly "free"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It's a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Assuming China doesn't have to spend literally any other money, even though countries are constantly investing in infrastructure and security and material to assist the business.

    But also, literally not free. My point stands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    You won't just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn't exist. It's not like all China cares about is data.

    Your question was "why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta". If China didn't get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.

  • source
  • parent