The House on Saturday passed a $95 billion aid package that includes two long-awaited bills with $60.8 billion of Ukraine aid and $26 billion in aid to Israel.

The Ukraine bill, which passed with 311 votes in favor, 112 votes against, and one present, will now head to the Senate alongside the Israel aid bill and two others — one with aid for Taiwan and another that forces Tiktok's parent company to sell it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 49 points 2 years ago (1 child)

TikTok is cancer regardless of who owns it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And at the same time if you preach so much free market economics then you should just learn to live with it and don't buy the product if you don't like it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Please show me an example where I

    preach so much free market economics

    (If you don’t find one it’s because I never did.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Anything from China is anything but free market. Chinese companies are still owned by the state who practice state capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don’t fall for the straw man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's not true at all. China has state owned businesses and private owned businesses. You think the Boeing and Microsoft locations in China are owned by the CCP?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    If you're being pedantic, you're right, but Chinese companies are still Chinese state-owned-- which Tiktok is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    that is bs with regard to the facts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Cry about it. I can taste your tears from here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So you acknowledge that you're disregarding facts and you're telling them to cry about it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You've seemed to have lost any coherent point in what you're saying. Step back everyone, this person hates facts and knows it! What a badass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Tell me more commie.

    In the last several years, particularly under Xi Jinping’s rule, there has been an even greater attempt by the political leadership to increase their control over the private sector, reduce its political influence, and ensure its loyalty to the system. This has included expanding the reach of national security policies and regulations. For example, the adoption of the National Intelligence Law in 2017 requires all firms in China to accede to government demands to provide information and data as authorities deem necessary to protect China’s national security. It has also meant using carrots, such as providing industrial policy opportunities to private firms, and sticks, such as the regulatory crackdown on private Internet firms that started in late 2018 and recently concluded. Finally, the CCP has also stepped up efforts to directly influence the corporate governance of private firms, in some cases taking “golden shares” in companies, pushing private firms to form CCP branches (see Figure 3), and integrating firms into the burgeoning “corporate social credit system” (CSCS).

    https://bigdatachina.csis.org/can-chinese-firms-be-truly-private/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No. There's privately owned industry in China.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It will never cease to amaze me that people can have the full power of the Internet at their fingertips and have the wherewithal to not look something up before saying something stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Of course you'd deny.

    In the last several years, particularly under Xi Jinping’s rule, there has been an even greater attempt by the political leadership to increase their control over the private sector, reduce its political influence, and ensure its loyalty to the system. This has included expanding the reach of national security policies and regulations. For example, the adoption of the National Intelligence Law in 2017 requires all firms in China to accede to government demands to provide information and data as authorities deem necessary to protect China’s national security. It has also meant using carrots, such as providing industrial policy opportunities to private firms, and sticks, such as the regulatory crackdown on private Internet firms that started in late 2018 and recently concluded. Finally, the CCP has also stepped up efforts to directly influence the corporate governance of private firms, in some cases taking “golden shares” in companies, pushing private firms to form CCP branches (see Figure 3), and integrating firms into the burgeoning “corporate social credit system” (CSCS).

    https://bigdatachina.csis.org/can-chinese-firms-be-truly-private/

  • source
  • parent