▲ 787 ▼ Lowest-taxed group in each state of the United States (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world 175 comments fedilink hide all child comments Source
[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 58 points 2 years ago (2 children) This is hard to look at! Tax the rich! permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) And then eat them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago and then tax them again for good measure permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikaaa@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) I never understood what that means. Cannibalism is not good for your health. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Quiet, you! Down the hatch! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago No, cannibalism isn't good for their health. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago We could make dog and cat food out of them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago "Cannibalism is not good for your health" 🤓☝️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) The rich don't have income, they are not represented here at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Tax their wealth then 🤷🏻♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago or you know, their charities would be quite sufficient permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The rich don’t have income They certainly have revenue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it's taxed differently and not present on these graphs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it’s taxed differently More "taxed not at all". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) And then eat them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago and then tax them again for good measure permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikaaa@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) I never understood what that means. Cannibalism is not good for your health. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Quiet, you! Down the hatch! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago No, cannibalism isn't good for their health. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago We could make dog and cat food out of them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago "Cannibalism is not good for your health" 🤓☝️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago and then tax them again for good measure permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nikaaa@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) I never understood what that means. Cannibalism is not good for your health. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Quiet, you! Down the hatch! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago No, cannibalism isn't good for their health. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago We could make dog and cat food out of them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago "Cannibalism is not good for your health" 🤓☝️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Quiet, you! Down the hatch! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago No, cannibalism isn't good for their health. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago We could make dog and cat food out of them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago "Cannibalism is not good for your health" 🤓☝️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) The rich don't have income, they are not represented here at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Tax their wealth then 🤷🏻♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago or you know, their charities would be quite sufficient permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The rich don’t have income They certainly have revenue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it's taxed differently and not present on these graphs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it’s taxed differently More "taxed not at all". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Tax their wealth then 🤷🏻♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago or you know, their charities would be quite sufficient permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago or you know, their charities would be quite sufficient permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The rich don’t have income They certainly have revenue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it's taxed differently and not present on these graphs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it’s taxed differently More "taxed not at all". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it's taxed differently and not present on these graphs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it’s taxed differently More "taxed not at all". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it’s taxed differently More "taxed not at all". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago Well, that's a different problem. permalink fedilink source parent
