▲ 1220 ▼ Whoops (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [M] to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) until someone tries to use a phillips bit on a pozidriv screw. pozidriv is better, but at that point, just use torx. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] notapantsday@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think both torx and pozidriv have their place. Torx for any screw that needs a lot of torque, is in a hard to reach place or for really small screws. When I have lot of screws in a simple application, like driving them directly into wood, I prefer pozidriv though. Due to the conical profile, the bit just automatically slides in correctly. Also, torx just has way too many different sizes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago fully agree, both have flaws and advantages. but both are better than phillips. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] notapantsday@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think both torx and pozidriv have their place. Torx for any screw that needs a lot of torque, is in a hard to reach place or for really small screws. When I have lot of screws in a simple application, like driving them directly into wood, I prefer pozidriv though. Due to the conical profile, the bit just automatically slides in correctly. Also, torx just has way too many different sizes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago fully agree, both have flaws and advantages. but both are better than phillips. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago fully agree, both have flaws and advantages. but both are better than phillips. permalink fedilink source parent
