139
Shoppers prefer 'vegan' food labels to 'confusing' plant-based terms, according to new survey (www.veganfoodandliving.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/vegan@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The Vegan Society does do certifications for products which will let you use their logo. I'm not aware of any laws which would stop you from calling a product vegan without that certification, just can't use their logo for it.

I can't remember if it was the EU or ISO which was working on a standard to classify a product as vegan in the past couple of years. Though the last news I heard about it was that it was being led by agricultural lobby rather than animal rights activists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure wether that logo is really as expensive as they claim, but there are tons of products out there with kind of selfmade logos or at least a little text which reads "vegan", "vegan friendly" or "suitable for a vegan diet". Of course the official logo is the safe one, but as it's still illegal to make misleading claims I guess one can trust 99% of those labels.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've got no idea how much the Vegan Society (or other orgs) charges for certification. As you said, plenty of other labels/logos they can use.

    I do occasionally see reports of companies labeling a product as vegan when it isn't. Usually from someone not understanding what vegan means (like honey). But those are pretty rare in the grand scheme of things.

    Unfortunately I'm not sure how good a case someone would have for misleading claims without any legal definition on what "Vegan" means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    IANAL, but usually if there's no existing legal definition, courts first look to the word's usual and ordinary meaning, which is to say, basically the dictionary definition. So even if they went with that definition over the Vegan Society's, it would at the very least contain no parts of animals, or secretions thereof.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent