▲ 359 ▼ The whole internet loves Kagi, a lovely paid search engine that can find things! 5 seconds later We regret to inform you the CEO is an unhinged narcissist who will harangue you in email (hackers.town) submitted 2 years ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/techtakes@awful.systems 206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why terrible? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) you’re right the other poster was most likely trying to stir up shit given we’re on a federated network (see also their other post), but I have been obsessed with the idea of a federated search engine this weekend it’s definitely a worthwhile idea, but anything that does federated indexing will have to deal with moderation and abuse prevention first. those are hard problems in ordinary federated networks, but search engines specifically are targets of hostile SEO and spam in ways that few other systems are. those aren’t insurmountable problems though — just ones that need to be solved before federation is practical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. Google is currently overwhelmed by SEO optimized crap (at least I guess so, I stopped using it years ago because of that) and I think a federated system where members have different prioritizations would make SEO optimization very very hard to abuse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago I hope so! this is something I’d like to implement, once I’ve got some free deployment resources and time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) you’re right the other poster was most likely trying to stir up shit given we’re on a federated network (see also their other post), but I have been obsessed with the idea of a federated search engine this weekend it’s definitely a worthwhile idea, but anything that does federated indexing will have to deal with moderation and abuse prevention first. those are hard problems in ordinary federated networks, but search engines specifically are targets of hostile SEO and spam in ways that few other systems are. those aren’t insurmountable problems though — just ones that need to be solved before federation is practical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. Google is currently overwhelmed by SEO optimized crap (at least I guess so, I stopped using it years ago because of that) and I think a federated system where members have different prioritizations would make SEO optimization very very hard to abuse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago I hope so! this is something I’d like to implement, once I’ve got some free deployment resources and time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. Google is currently overwhelmed by SEO optimized crap (at least I guess so, I stopped using it years ago because of that) and I think a federated system where members have different prioritizations would make SEO optimization very very hard to abuse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago I hope so! this is something I’d like to implement, once I’ve got some free deployment resources and time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago I hope so! this is something I’d like to implement, once I’ve got some free deployment resources and time. permalink fedilink source parent