you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

that wasn't my intention

Ironically, by saying that you're just doing The Thing again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Catch 22. Nothing else I can say 🤷‍♀️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • I mean yeah, it kind of is. Unfortunately when folks impersonate the clueless in bad faith the people who legitimately don't know stuff tend to get caught in the crossfire, and I say this as someone who is frequently clueless.

    Best advice I can offer is to develop a thick skin about it and be willing to put the work in if someone helps you find the keywords to look up. The more of the background you can find yourself the better equipped you'll be to ask specific questions that are less likely to be suspected for JAQing us around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The Thing in question has an element of intent that the user doesn't exhibit in this thread, or any of their history. Simply asking questions isn't JAQing off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    maybe they caught a ban cause of their weird fucking vibes and cause they couldn’t help but thread a bunch of low-effort garbage into a moderator announcement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You can always look at the modlog. Only bans the user in question has are almost a month old from a conservative community for not being conservative and a furry community for saying "furries 🤢."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments