▲ 96 ▼ Flathub is launching their new featured banners on April 20 using brand colors provided by publishers (floss.social) submitted 2 years ago by IverCoder@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're assuming they can only do one thing at a time, and that the same people who work on this also work on what you speak about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) No I'm assuming they've a limited number of resources, like everyone else, and they like to pool them in the wrong things. Besides they don't want to open the door for offline and mirroring because then they would lose their privileged position of being the single largest and most used way to get flatpaks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lengau@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) For all the crap Canonical gets about snaps, these are kinda trivial with snapd. snap download will download a snap and its related assertion, you can install unsigned snaps with --dangerous, and you can add trusted certificates to snapd with a single command. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Ironic isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Of course they have a limited pool of resources. All projects do, it kinda goes without saying. Still doesn't mean that the people who implemented this are the same ones who could implement what you're after. And besides, it should be the Flatpak project you're asking for this, not FlatHub. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mirroring part of their repository is kind of their responsibility I guess... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago How so? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) No I'm assuming they've a limited number of resources, like everyone else, and they like to pool them in the wrong things. Besides they don't want to open the door for offline and mirroring because then they would lose their privileged position of being the single largest and most used way to get flatpaks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lengau@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) For all the crap Canonical gets about snaps, these are kinda trivial with snapd. snap download will download a snap and its related assertion, you can install unsigned snaps with --dangerous, and you can add trusted certificates to snapd with a single command. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Ironic isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Of course they have a limited pool of resources. All projects do, it kinda goes without saying. Still doesn't mean that the people who implemented this are the same ones who could implement what you're after. And besides, it should be the Flatpak project you're asking for this, not FlatHub. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mirroring part of their repository is kind of their responsibility I guess... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago How so? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lengau@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) For all the crap Canonical gets about snaps, these are kinda trivial with snapd. snap download will download a snap and its related assertion, you can install unsigned snaps with --dangerous, and you can add trusted certificates to snapd with a single command. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Ironic isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Of course they have a limited pool of resources. All projects do, it kinda goes without saying. Still doesn't mean that the people who implemented this are the same ones who could implement what you're after. And besides, it should be the Flatpak project you're asking for this, not FlatHub. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mirroring part of their repository is kind of their responsibility I guess... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago How so? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mirroring part of their repository is kind of their responsibility I guess... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago How so? permalink fedilink source parent