▲ 226 ▼ Caitlin Clark's reward for a record-smashing NCAA career: A $76,000 WNBA salary (www.motherjones.com) submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world [M] to c/news@lemmy.world 109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 years ago (1 child) She has north of 3m in sponsorship deals right now, and we can only assume that number will go up in the WNBA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silverbax@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (1 child) It may go down in the WNBA. Caitlin Clark isn't the first player who was expected to make the WNBA popular (Maya Moore, Brittany Griner, etc). It's far too early to tell if she will have any impact on WNBA viewership. The issue is that NIL money is also a way for boosters to pay players to stay instead of the shadowy back door deals that used to happen. Now NIL just allows boosters to pay players through a legitimate channel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago A lot of NIL money during the off-season is booster money, yes. That's money that basically will only go to athletes signed with a particular school. But there's also a lot of NIL money for actual big budget TV/print advertising from national corporations for ads produced by major ad agencies. That's money that follows the athlete. Not all of it will follow the athlete to the pros (and not every athlete goes pro), especially since the WNBA seems to have lower viewership than NCAA women's basketball. But if anyone is gonna be making good money on sponsorships in the WNBA, it'll be Caitlin Clark. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silverbax@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (1 child) It may go down in the WNBA. Caitlin Clark isn't the first player who was expected to make the WNBA popular (Maya Moore, Brittany Griner, etc). It's far too early to tell if she will have any impact on WNBA viewership. The issue is that NIL money is also a way for boosters to pay players to stay instead of the shadowy back door deals that used to happen. Now NIL just allows boosters to pay players through a legitimate channel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago A lot of NIL money during the off-season is booster money, yes. That's money that basically will only go to athletes signed with a particular school. But there's also a lot of NIL money for actual big budget TV/print advertising from national corporations for ads produced by major ad agencies. That's money that follows the athlete. Not all of it will follow the athlete to the pros (and not every athlete goes pro), especially since the WNBA seems to have lower viewership than NCAA women's basketball. But if anyone is gonna be making good money on sponsorships in the WNBA, it'll be Caitlin Clark. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago A lot of NIL money during the off-season is booster money, yes. That's money that basically will only go to athletes signed with a particular school. But there's also a lot of NIL money for actual big budget TV/print advertising from national corporations for ads produced by major ad agencies. That's money that follows the athlete. Not all of it will follow the athlete to the pros (and not every athlete goes pro), especially since the WNBA seems to have lower viewership than NCAA women's basketball. But if anyone is gonna be making good money on sponsorships in the WNBA, it'll be Caitlin Clark. permalink fedilink source parent