you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Who pays extra for suburbs? Suburbs are significantly cheaper than the city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because they're subsidized to Fuck and city costs are inflated. Suburbs are ecological nightmares, and cannot continue to exist if you want a green earth in 80 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    How are suburbs subsidized and how are city costs inflated?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    City costs are inflated by exploitative landlords.

    Suburb costs are subsidized by basically all the infrastructure for them; none of it pays for itself. Not the roads not the wiring not the water and sewer. Yes I know everywhere has roads, but suburbs demand a high standard of them and don't produce anything with them.

    Youre not being space efficient like a city, or (whatever degree of) self sufficient like the country, so everything is just car trips, any time you leave the house. Like in OP.

  • source
  • parent