▲ 102 ▼ Sweden raises its terror threat to four out of five after Quran burnings (www.euronews.com) submitted 3 years ago by OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) You said "malicious as it gets". So can you please answer the question? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) You mean that hypocritical question? where do you place mass killings and terrorism on your maliciousness scale? Obviously calling mass killings malicious is a diminution and I would strongly refuse doing so because of that. Mass killings are obviously far beyond malicious, more like really fucking evil. Terrorism is another topic because it depends very much on perspective since one persons terrorist is another persons freedom fighter. However the actual question here seems to be why it is so important to you to derail from the actual topic of the discussion, which is the malicious public burning of holy symbols of a world religion to intentionally create more hate and violence in a world that already has way too much of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) You keep using the word malicious, so in order to move forward, I feel we need to get a sense of your maliciousness scale. So, punching someone in the face, more or less malicious then burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I hope it´s not too sophisticated for you to grasp but the answer to your question depends on context ... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) So in this context, answer it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) You mean that hypocritical question? where do you place mass killings and terrorism on your maliciousness scale? Obviously calling mass killings malicious is a diminution and I would strongly refuse doing so because of that. Mass killings are obviously far beyond malicious, more like really fucking evil. Terrorism is another topic because it depends very much on perspective since one persons terrorist is another persons freedom fighter. However the actual question here seems to be why it is so important to you to derail from the actual topic of the discussion, which is the malicious public burning of holy symbols of a world religion to intentionally create more hate and violence in a world that already has way too much of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) You keep using the word malicious, so in order to move forward, I feel we need to get a sense of your maliciousness scale. So, punching someone in the face, more or less malicious then burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I hope it´s not too sophisticated for you to grasp but the answer to your question depends on context ... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) So in this context, answer it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) You keep using the word malicious, so in order to move forward, I feel we need to get a sense of your maliciousness scale. So, punching someone in the face, more or less malicious then burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I hope it´s not too sophisticated for you to grasp but the answer to your question depends on context ... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) So in this context, answer it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I hope it´s not too sophisticated for you to grasp but the answer to your question depends on context ... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) So in this context, answer it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) So in this context, answer it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify. Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ... permalink fedilink source parent