▲ 311 ▼ Fedora proposal to change default desktop to KDE (fedoraproject.org) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) That is not a great idea. KDE prioritizes features and customization over stability and out of the box experience. The spin is there for those who want it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] m4@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) KDE prioritizes features and customization over stability and out of the box experience. I mean, the fact that the very new major release of KDE almost hadn't added new features and focused on a rather smooth upgrade kinda proves otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) KDE has tons of customization which is great for people who want to rice. Back in the day I was into ricing and DIY Linux. However, KDE is a poor choice for a mainstream workstation as there are way to many configuration options which leads to everything getting buried. It also doesn't look as nice out of the box. I think the KDE spin is great for those who want to customize. For everyone else there is gnome and its derivatives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago As the above commenter already said, ... Not Anymore permalink fedilink source parent [–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Like the stability of blowing up extensions and APIs across minor point releases? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 years ago It really is not that big of a problem from my experience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] different_base@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Exactly. While I love Plasma for what it is, I also don't love certain things like lack of polish, stability etc. Again no offense. Fedora Workstation aims to be a stable OS with sensible defaults for wider audience including home users, disabled people and developers who want to get things done rather than tweaking their OS. GNOME may not have great customizability as Plasma but it is stable and well polished for average user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] m4@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) KDE prioritizes features and customization over stability and out of the box experience. I mean, the fact that the very new major release of KDE almost hadn't added new features and focused on a rather smooth upgrade kinda proves otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) KDE has tons of customization which is great for people who want to rice. Back in the day I was into ricing and DIY Linux. However, KDE is a poor choice for a mainstream workstation as there are way to many configuration options which leads to everything getting buried. It also doesn't look as nice out of the box. I think the KDE spin is great for those who want to customize. For everyone else there is gnome and its derivatives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago As the above commenter already said, ... Not Anymore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) KDE has tons of customization which is great for people who want to rice. Back in the day I was into ricing and DIY Linux. However, KDE is a poor choice for a mainstream workstation as there are way to many configuration options which leads to everything getting buried. It also doesn't look as nice out of the box. I think the KDE spin is great for those who want to customize. For everyone else there is gnome and its derivatives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago As the above commenter already said, ... Not Anymore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago As the above commenter already said, ... Not Anymore permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Like the stability of blowing up extensions and APIs across minor point releases? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 years ago It really is not that big of a problem from my experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 years ago It really is not that big of a problem from my experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] different_base@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Exactly. While I love Plasma for what it is, I also don't love certain things like lack of polish, stability etc. Again no offense. Fedora Workstation aims to be a stable OS with sensible defaults for wider audience including home users, disabled people and developers who want to get things done rather than tweaking their OS. GNOME may not have great customizability as Plasma but it is stable and well polished for average user. permalink fedilink source parent