cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4808492

Also must read:

Sex lives in focus for Ukraine's injured veterans - BBC

"There's sex in the hospital, sex at home, sex before procedures, sex after. There's a lot of good sex going on"

-- Ivona Kostyna is one of the founders of Veteran Hub, the group which runs the ReSex project

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A conspicuously laid-out piece that quotes social media with no stated methodology.

Punishing individuals that have to act in pornography is unacceptable, but the industry itself promotes or directly involves human trafficking and preys upon a system that cannot provide enough for its people. Sex positivity is great, but this has a serious economic component.

I think a very important question is why were no non-reactionary "against" voices heard. Why only the cons? Why not a selective ban? Who really wants you to support this policy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    You can legalize pornography without legalizing human trafficking. Since those are covered by separate laws it's actually super easy, barely an inconvenience. Just don't touch the human trafficking laws when you amend the pornography ones.

  • source
  • parent