▲ 85 ▼ Why don't more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like (www.zdnet.com) submitted 3 years ago by Nicbudd@beehaw.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml 189 comments fedilink hide all child comments I'm curious to hear thoughts on this. I agree for the most part, I just wish people would see the benefit of choice and be brave enough to try it out.
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) You mean you DON'T drive a Car brand car, wear Shoes brand shoes and drink this delicious-looking beverage?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child) There’s also literal 15% food. Better not think about the remaining 85%. Just see what google translate says about “ruoka” (in Finnish) or “mat” (in Swedish). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) 75% no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago Wolfram aplha is probably just violating some fundamental axioms of mathematics to say the answer is 85. I’m not a mathematician, so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child) There’s also literal 15% food. Better not think about the remaining 85%. Just see what google translate says about “ruoka” (in Finnish) or “mat” (in Swedish). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) 75% no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago Wolfram aplha is probably just violating some fundamental axioms of mathematics to say the answer is 85. I’m not a mathematician, so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) 75% no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago Wolfram aplha is probably just violating some fundamental axioms of mathematics to say the answer is 85. I’m not a mathematician, so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago Wolfram aplha is probably just violating some fundamental axioms of mathematics to say the answer is 85. I’m not a mathematician, so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent
