▲ 305 ▼ 'Oppenheimer' finally premieres in Japan to mixed reactions and high emotions (www.npr.org) submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 216 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) What? You provided a source that states just that?... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Still trying to shift the goal posts. I will not be responding to your 5 second skim of a source you didn't read because you think you gotta win an argument above all else. You asked for a source that showed the bombings were unnecessary. You got it. Defend the point or shut it. If you want to argue the finer details of the American strategic bombing campaign and it's effectiveness then get a history degree. Because that is NOT the argument being made here. Neither by me or by you. Attempting to bring that up is irrelevant to the conversation at hand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your source states, based on your quote, that the atomic bombings would be unnecessary if the strategic bombing continued... and that's your argument for why the atomic bombings were unjustified? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Done with you. Misrepresenting my argument and moving the goal posts. You have given up defending your point, that the nukes were necessary and instead are trying portray my argument, that the nukes were unnecessary, as one advocating for continued strategic bombardment. You wanna read more about strategic bombing in general and it's own inadequacies then go ahead. But that's not what this conversation is. Go get a history degree if you want to dive into the nuances, otherwise continued arguments with you are pointless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago You throw out random sources that you hope would support your claim, so yeah, I feel this thing is done to. From the start, actually, waste of time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Still trying to shift the goal posts. I will not be responding to your 5 second skim of a source you didn't read because you think you gotta win an argument above all else. You asked for a source that showed the bombings were unnecessary. You got it. Defend the point or shut it. If you want to argue the finer details of the American strategic bombing campaign and it's effectiveness then get a history degree. Because that is NOT the argument being made here. Neither by me or by you. Attempting to bring that up is irrelevant to the conversation at hand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your source states, based on your quote, that the atomic bombings would be unnecessary if the strategic bombing continued... and that's your argument for why the atomic bombings were unjustified? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Done with you. Misrepresenting my argument and moving the goal posts. You have given up defending your point, that the nukes were necessary and instead are trying portray my argument, that the nukes were unnecessary, as one advocating for continued strategic bombardment. You wanna read more about strategic bombing in general and it's own inadequacies then go ahead. But that's not what this conversation is. Go get a history degree if you want to dive into the nuances, otherwise continued arguments with you are pointless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago You throw out random sources that you hope would support your claim, so yeah, I feel this thing is done to. From the start, actually, waste of time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your source states, based on your quote, that the atomic bombings would be unnecessary if the strategic bombing continued... and that's your argument for why the atomic bombings were unjustified? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Done with you. Misrepresenting my argument and moving the goal posts. You have given up defending your point, that the nukes were necessary and instead are trying portray my argument, that the nukes were unnecessary, as one advocating for continued strategic bombardment. You wanna read more about strategic bombing in general and it's own inadequacies then go ahead. But that's not what this conversation is. Go get a history degree if you want to dive into the nuances, otherwise continued arguments with you are pointless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago You throw out random sources that you hope would support your claim, so yeah, I feel this thing is done to. From the start, actually, waste of time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Done with you. Misrepresenting my argument and moving the goal posts. You have given up defending your point, that the nukes were necessary and instead are trying portray my argument, that the nukes were unnecessary, as one advocating for continued strategic bombardment. You wanna read more about strategic bombing in general and it's own inadequacies then go ahead. But that's not what this conversation is. Go get a history degree if you want to dive into the nuances, otherwise continued arguments with you are pointless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago You throw out random sources that you hope would support your claim, so yeah, I feel this thing is done to. From the start, actually, waste of time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago You throw out random sources that you hope would support your claim, so yeah, I feel this thing is done to. From the start, actually, waste of time. permalink fedilink source parent