you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

There is absolutely no situation where reducing a conversation on gender to basic algebra isn't stupid, but like I said, the initial comment is stupid and deserves a stupid response. It was a good response, but I think we can all admit the conversation itself was stupid and meaningless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is absolutely no situation where reducing a conversation on gender to basic algebra isn't stupid

    Except this one. If you're going to be so fundamentally wrong that you can be refuted by elementary arithmetic, why should anyone bother putting any more thought into it than that? No, you can't reduce gender relations to a basic math question, but you can reduce thst guy's take without missing anything important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There is absolutely no situation where reducing a conversation on gender to basic algebra isn’t stupid

    If they were doing so in totality (ie: all conversations on gender being compared to basic algebra) then I'd agree with you. However the response is so targeted, in it's content and in the context of going after a specific respondent who was saying that things that are different cannot be equal, that I don't think they fall into this trap.

  • source
  • parent