Film about ‘father of the atomic bomb’ finally opens in Japan after being delayed by outrage at ‘Barbenheimer’ memes

Archived version: https://archive.ph/8vjF7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

That isn't a "What If", that was literally our plan if the bomb was not developed in time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's tough to decide between which war crime to commit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Friend, Japan started that war and refused to surrender. The American people literally did not want to participate in that specific war.

    The USA is really fucking good at killing people. Japan knew this and they still decided to attack.

    Loss of civilian life is unavoidable when two countries initiate a full scale war. Does it suck to be on the losing end of that? Absolutely. Unfortunately, at the time, war consisted of bombing and ground warfare. Japan seemed to have no plans to leave the USA alone so the American hand was forced to pick between the few very bad options. All of them would result in a dramatic loss of life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Curious, what do they teach you about Japanese involvement in WW2 in your (presumably Japan's) education system?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    The mothers and babies who were incinerated by American nukes weren't involved. Wanna go after the Japanese Army or government? Go for it. Don't murder babies and call it a good thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Do you hold the Japanese military to the same standards w.r.t. their war crimes in East Asia?

    Rape of nanking in particular comes to mind as an example where they are not abiding by the standards you suggest.

    I would argue that was much crueler than nukes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, yes I do hold them to that standard. The Japanese Army did atrocious things in China, and just like Americans, they justified it by claiming it was the lesser evil. I don't understand why you think Japan's war crimes are a justification for nuking a city. Especially since nobody knew about those atrocities at the time, and also because Americans have never cared about dead Chinese.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I’ll make this simple for you: America did not want to be involved in the war that Japan forced them into. They were suffering mass casualties in the pacific theater. The Japanese were torturing US POWs and using suicide kamikaze attacks against US naval vessels which also resulted in huge numbers of casualties.

    They figured nuking these guys a couple of times would finally get them to fucking stop, and what do you know? It did. Mission accomplished. End of story.

    They were justified because doing that allowed them to finally stop getting killed and tortured by the nation that attacked them first. I too hate the fact that the Japanese imperial government put its people in such peril with so little regard for their safety.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I think it's much harder to justify systemic rape and murder of civilians across months as being the "lesser" evil, but maybe that's just me...

    A large number of rapes were done systematically by the Japanese soldiers as they went from door to door, searching for girls, with many women being captured and gang-raped.[49] The women were often killed immediately after being raped, often through explicit mutilation,[50] such as by penetrating vaginas with bayonets, long sticks of bamboo, or other objects.

    Your pleas to only target military and government targets would fall on much more sympathetic ears if the same country did not do this less than a decade prior.

    Again. This seems so much crueler than getting nuked. The decision to take civilian lives are being repeatedly made, over the course of months, in the sickest way possible for the enjoyment of the soldiers.

    At least 200k civilians killed, estimates of up to 80k women raped.

    Can you honestly look me in the eye and tell me that the japanese people of that time believed only military and government should be targeted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Who is calling it a good thing? Nobody in this thread is celebrating the bombing. They are saying it was necessary or at least justified and they are more correct than you.

  • source
  • parent