β² 840 βΌ hell yeah mint (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by RedditEnjoyer@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 173 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (5 children) Use Arch if you want maintaining your system to be a hobby in its own right. Use Mint if you just want something that works. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [β] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) The funny thing is, I feel like I have to maintain my arch system less than Windows permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] growingentropy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago It's definitely not as bad as people make out. That said, I only run Arch on my main machine, and Debian on the rest. Just in case, you understand. permalink fedilink source parent [β] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago Unless you want two monitors with different scaling. permalink fedilink source parent [β] midnight@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago Arch is great if you want to customize your system, but I wouldn't say it really needs "maintaining" beyond just updating more frequently. (which you don't even really need to do very often, you just have the option to get newer versions of software.) permalink fedilink source parent [β] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 point 2 years ago I don't even update my Arch setup that often. Most of my stuff lives in flatpaks. I just want updated software and rolling release, which Arch is the best for that. permalink fedilink source parent [β] derpgon@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Same with Manjaro π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Armando3996@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Jeez, no. Use endeavouros permalink fedilink source parent [β] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago i've had manjaro break way more than normal arch permalink fedilink source parent
[β] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) The funny thing is, I feel like I have to maintain my arch system less than Windows permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] growingentropy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago It's definitely not as bad as people make out. That said, I only run Arch on my main machine, and Debian on the rest. Just in case, you understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] growingentropy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago It's definitely not as bad as people make out. That said, I only run Arch on my main machine, and Debian on the rest. Just in case, you understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago Unless you want two monitors with different scaling. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] midnight@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago Arch is great if you want to customize your system, but I wouldn't say it really needs "maintaining" beyond just updating more frequently. (which you don't even really need to do very often, you just have the option to get newer versions of software.) permalink fedilink source parent
[β] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 point 2 years ago I don't even update my Arch setup that often. Most of my stuff lives in flatpaks. I just want updated software and rolling release, which Arch is the best for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] derpgon@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Same with Manjaro π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Armando3996@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Jeez, no. Use endeavouros permalink fedilink source parent [β] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago i've had manjaro break way more than normal arch permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Armando3996@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Jeez, no. Use endeavouros permalink fedilink source parent
[β] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago i've had manjaro break way more than normal arch permalink fedilink source parent
