you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The "open sourced" private components repo is under a fauxpen source (non-commercial) license. Floorp is still proprietary.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not proprietary, but source-available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ok sure, but most people associate proprietary with closed-source. What's wrong with just saying source-available (instead of open-source)? Calling this proprietary just leads to confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments