PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,162 readers

4,984 active

251 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Baldur’s Gate 3 lead says Wizards of the Coast “is not to blame” for new direction (www.pcgamesn.com)

submitted 2 years ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Honestly I disagree that dos2 was better I think bg3 was much more intricate with skills abilities and playstyles than dos2 was

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

Agree. DOS' elemental surface effects was cool, but having to deal with it all the time got old. Even more so with necrofire. I'm really hoping DOS3 learn something from BG3's more conservative usage of surface effects.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4