To be fair I was under the assumption that he wasn't intending to capitalize on this situation at all, he did surrender the firearm used and requested it to be destroyed after the proceedings concluded so that it wouldn't be sold-off and used as some sort of political symbol.. It saddens me to learn that he is using such a tragedy to push any form of message other than a anti-firearm cautionary tale.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
replies: