▲ 1196 ▼ Mafs (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.world 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] wischi@programming.dev 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Original post is not linearly interpolating but exponentially. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Localhorst86@feddit.de 28 points 2 years ago* (3 children) this comic uses a log scale (I extrapolate this from the only two data points given). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that were the case, the y-axis label would be log(NUMBER OF HUSBANDS), no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 2 years ago It's a choice, it's not mandatory to use a log on your y axis when you plot a log. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (apologies for pedantry) This can't be the case, as the zero point is visible in the graph and even gets crossed to the negatives. Log scale graphs only show positive values and place zero infinitely below the horizontal axis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wischi@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Nice. Haven't thought about that 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Localhorst86@feddit.de 28 points 2 years ago* (3 children) this comic uses a log scale (I extrapolate this from the only two data points given). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that were the case, the y-axis label would be log(NUMBER OF HUSBANDS), no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 2 years ago It's a choice, it's not mandatory to use a log on your y axis when you plot a log. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (apologies for pedantry) This can't be the case, as the zero point is visible in the graph and even gets crossed to the negatives. Log scale graphs only show positive values and place zero infinitely below the horizontal axis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wischi@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Nice. Haven't thought about that 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that were the case, the y-axis label would be log(NUMBER OF HUSBANDS), no? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 2 years ago It's a choice, it's not mandatory to use a log on your y axis when you plot a log. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 2 years ago It's a choice, it's not mandatory to use a log on your y axis when you plot a log. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (apologies for pedantry) This can't be the case, as the zero point is visible in the graph and even gets crossed to the negatives. Log scale graphs only show positive values and place zero infinitely below the horizontal axis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wischi@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago Nice. Haven't thought about that 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
