▲ 119 ▼ 8-hour time-restricted eating linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular death (newsroom.heart.org) submitted 2 years ago by nulluser@programming.dev to c/news@lemmy.world 36 comments fedilink hide all child comments As a big fan of IF, I find this really depressing.
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn't matter if it's peer reviewed. There isn't enough data to establish causality. Chances are people who do those sorts of diets are already at risk. That's the super important data points we don't have. So even if their peers confirm the data is accurate and their analysis is accurate it doesn't mean anything without further study. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Yep, I don't see any way they could prove statistical significance as they could not reject the null hypothesis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Yep, I don't see any way they could prove statistical significance as they could not reject the null hypothesis. permalink fedilink source parent