▲ 248 ▼ Trump can't secure $454 million appeal bond in New York fraud case, his lawyers say (ground.news) submitted 2 years ago by StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world 36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 child) Finally, lack of money is what will stop him appealing every (fucking) judgments. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ceiphas@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) But he secured the funding through the RNC... more money to appeal everything, and it isn't even his money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) No he didn't. They don't have enough money. In NY State you have to pay up before you appeal. That's to prevent someone just appealing to delay payment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) So he can still appeal, but NY can/will begin liquidating his properties to satisfy his penalty while he waits for his appeal to play out (they'll have taken everything they can by the time his appeal is even heard more than likely - as courts are backed up). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Ah, you're right. He can appeal but it doesn't delay the payment process. He's going nuts because no one will lend him money. He says it's an "inconvenience because he has to sell properties". He should never have had that money in the first place! He owes all those back taxes from lying about the value of his properties. I saw someone describe it like this: This is like someone who is convicted of fraud complaining that it's an inconvenience to give the money back. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ceiphas@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) But he secured the funding through the RNC... more money to appeal everything, and it isn't even his money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) No he didn't. They don't have enough money. In NY State you have to pay up before you appeal. That's to prevent someone just appealing to delay payment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) So he can still appeal, but NY can/will begin liquidating his properties to satisfy his penalty while he waits for his appeal to play out (they'll have taken everything they can by the time his appeal is even heard more than likely - as courts are backed up). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Ah, you're right. He can appeal but it doesn't delay the payment process. He's going nuts because no one will lend him money. He says it's an "inconvenience because he has to sell properties". He should never have had that money in the first place! He owes all those back taxes from lying about the value of his properties. I saw someone describe it like this: This is like someone who is convicted of fraud complaining that it's an inconvenience to give the money back. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) No he didn't. They don't have enough money. In NY State you have to pay up before you appeal. That's to prevent someone just appealing to delay payment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) So he can still appeal, but NY can/will begin liquidating his properties to satisfy his penalty while he waits for his appeal to play out (they'll have taken everything they can by the time his appeal is even heard more than likely - as courts are backed up). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Ah, you're right. He can appeal but it doesn't delay the payment process. He's going nuts because no one will lend him money. He says it's an "inconvenience because he has to sell properties". He should never have had that money in the first place! He owes all those back taxes from lying about the value of his properties. I saw someone describe it like this: This is like someone who is convicted of fraud complaining that it's an inconvenience to give the money back. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) So he can still appeal, but NY can/will begin liquidating his properties to satisfy his penalty while he waits for his appeal to play out (they'll have taken everything they can by the time his appeal is even heard more than likely - as courts are backed up). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Ah, you're right. He can appeal but it doesn't delay the payment process. He's going nuts because no one will lend him money. He says it's an "inconvenience because he has to sell properties". He should never have had that money in the first place! He owes all those back taxes from lying about the value of his properties. I saw someone describe it like this: This is like someone who is convicted of fraud complaining that it's an inconvenience to give the money back. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Ah, you're right. He can appeal but it doesn't delay the payment process. He's going nuts because no one will lend him money. He says it's an "inconvenience because he has to sell properties". He should never have had that money in the first place! He owes all those back taxes from lying about the value of his properties. I saw someone describe it like this: This is like someone who is convicted of fraud complaining that it's an inconvenience to give the money back. permalink fedilink source parent